Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Christie Sullivan v. Frank Rubino, et al
as 09-2263
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHRISTIE L. SULLIVAN
Defendant - Appellant: FRANK RUBINO, Officer
Defendant: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN and UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Coalition to Defend Affirmativ, et al v. Regents of the University of M, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1111
Plaintiff: COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, et al.,
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHASE CANTRELL, et al.,
Defendant: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, et al.,
Intervenor - Appellee: MICHAEL COX, Michigan Attorney General
Coalition to Defend Affirmativ v. Regents of the University of M, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1534
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight For Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN)
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, MARY SUE COLEMAN and others
Coalition to Defend Affirmativ, et al v. Regents of the University of M, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1387
Amicus Curiae: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN), et al.,
Intervenor - Appellee: MICHAEL COX, Michigan Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Coalition to Defend Affirmativ, et al v. Regents of the University of M, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1389
Plaintiff - Appellee: COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION and CHASE CANTRELL, et al.,
Defendant: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Defendant - Appellant: ERIC RUSSELL
Intervenor - Appellant: JENNIFER GRATZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?