Cases 21 - 30 of 192
Sandra Cunningham, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1492
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SANDRA A. CUNNINGHAM, Next Friend of P.A., a minor and P.A., a minor, by Sandra A. Cunningham, Next Friend
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIMOTHY THRONE, Superintendent and STEVEN WOLF, Principal
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Jeffrey Franz, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1483
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY FRANZ, Individually and as Next Friend as to RF and BF, minors, BRANDI FRANZ, Individually and as Next Friend as to RF and BF, minors, RF, a Minor, By Next Friends Jeffrey Franz and Brandi Franz and others
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIMOTHY THRONE, Superintendent, STEVEN WOLF, Principal and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Jeffrey Franz, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1563
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY FRANZ, Individually and as Next Friend as to RF and BF, minors, BRANDI FRANZ, Individually and as Next Friend as to RF and BF, minors, BF, a Minor, By Next Friends Jeffrey Franz and Brandi Franz and others
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Steve St. Juliana, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1487
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVE ST. JULIANA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hana St. Juliana and RSJ, a Minor, by Next Friend Steve St Julaina
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIMOTHY THRONE, Superintendent, KENNETH WEAVER, Superintendent and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Steve St. Juliana, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1561
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVE ST. JULIANA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hana St. Juliana and RSJ, a Minor, by Next Friend Steve St Julaina
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Brian Alford v. Thomas Schweitzer, et al
as 23-3451
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH ALFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS SCHWEITZER, Warden Madison Correctional Intitution, in his official and individual capacity, C. CANN, Unit Management Chief Madison Correctional Institution, in his official and individual capacity, Z. GOULD, Inspector, Madison Correctional Institution, in his official and individual capacity and others
Mark White v. MDOC, et al
as 23-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, DENTIST SMITH and others
William Myre, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1489
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM MYRE, Estate of TM, Co-Personal Representative, SHERI MYRE, Estate of TM, Co-Personal Representative, TM, Estate of and others
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIMOTHY THRONE, Superintendent, STEVEN WOLF, Principal and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Matthew Mueller, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1493
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATTHEW MUELLER, Next Friend of EM, a minor, MARY MUELLER, Next Friend of EM, a minor and E.M., a minor, by Next Friends Matthew and Mary Mueller
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIMOTHY THRONE, Superintendent, STEVEN WOLF, Principal and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Kylie Ossege v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1491
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KYLIE OSSEGE
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIMOTHY THRONE, Superintendent and STEVEN WOLF, Principal
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
