Cases 21 - 30 of 328
John Harris v. James Smith, et al
as 22-1682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ISAAC HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES M. SMITH, President, Eastern Michigan University, RHONDA LONGWORTH, Provost and Executive Vice, EUNICE JEFFRIES and others
Lois Ford-Kimbrough v. OH, et al
as 22-3635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOIS FORD-KIMBROUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
August FordIn re: August Ford
as 22-5628
Petitioner:
In re: AUGUST ANTHONY FORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Ford Motor Company
as 22-0109
Petitioner:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Respondent:
PAUL WEIDMAN, TERESA PERRY, ROY NAASZ and others
Kevin Cassaday v. Sparrow Health System, et al
as 22-1528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SPARROW HEALTH SYSTEM, LANSING RADIOLOGY, UGAR TOEMET and others
Phillip Bloodworth v. Mark Pouperd, et al
as 22-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP BLOODWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER MARK POUPERD, JOHN DOE 1, 1st Shift Commander, CORRECTION OFFICER FORD and others
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Samuel Ford v. Hector Joyner
as 22-5201
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL B. FORD
Respondent / Appellee:
HECTOR JOYNER, Warden
Kevin Cassaday v. Henry Ford Allegiance Health, Inc., et al
as 22-1125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Defendant / Appellee:
MRO and HENRY FORD HEALTH
Defendant:
HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
