Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Patrick Simpson, et al v. Natalie Riley, et al
as 10-5994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH, RICHARD GALIETTI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATALIE RILEY, RDAP Staff, AMANDA HUGHES, RDAP Staff and HICKEY, Warden
Natalie Vargas v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical
as 09-3777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATALIE T. VARGAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL
Natalie Hornbeak-Denton, et al v. Gary Myers, et al
as 08-6382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATALIE HORNBEAK-DENTON and ANNE HORNBEAK
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY T. MYERS, TWRA Executive Director, individually and in his official capacity, JOHN C. GREGORY, TWRA Chief of Real Estate and Forestry, individually and in his official capacity, R. B. "BUDDY" BAIRD and others
Hughes, et al v. White, et al
as 07-3211
Plaintiff:
CARL F. HUGHES, in his capacity as guardian for other Martin J. Hughes, Jr., et al.
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
NATALIE A. HUGHES, duly-appointed representative of the Estate of Martin J. Hughes, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
DOUG WHITE, Director, Ohio Department of Commerce, F. SCOTT O'DONNELL, Superintendent Division of Financial Institutions, KENNETH A. ROBERTS, Acting Deputy Superintendent Credit Unions and others
Hughes, et al v. White, et al
as 07-3102
Plaintiff:
CARL F. HUGHES, in his capacity as guardian for other Martin J. Hughes, Jr., et al.
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
NATALIE A. HUGHES, duly-appointed representative of the Estate of Martin J. Hughes, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
DOUG WHITE, Director, Ohio Department of Commerce, F. SCOTT O'DONNELL, Superintendent Division of Financial Institutions, KENNETH A. ROBERTS, Acting Deputy Superintendent Credit Unions and others
USA v. Coker
as 06-6504
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NATALIE COKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
