Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
Bamrung Chumpia, et al v. Memphis Area Teacher Credit Un
as 09-6329
Plaintiff - Appellant: BAMRUNG P. CHUMPIA, on behalf of himself and his spouse
Plaintiff: STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter
Defendant - Appellee: MEMPHIS AREA TEACHER CREDIT UNION
Luther Gray v. Frank Anderson, et al
as 09-6219
Petitioner - Appellant: LUTHER GRAY, aka Khalil-Ullah Abdul Al-Muhaymin
Respondent - Appellee: FRANK ANDERSON, Sheriff, Marion County, Indianapolis, IN, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR. and BRET MIZE, Warden
Luther Gray v. Frank Anderson, et al
as 09-6219
Petitioner / Appellant: LUTHER GRAY, aka Khalil-Ullah Abdul Al-Muhaymin
Respondent / Appellee: FRANK ANDERSON, Sheriff, Marion County, Indianapolis, IN, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR. and BRET MIZE, Warden
Joseph Faulkner v. Robert Cooper, Jr., et al
as 09-5101
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSEPH FAULKNER
Respondent - Appellee: ROBERT E. COOPER, JR. and MICHAEL GARRETT, Warden of FCI-Peterson
Rosalind Kurita v. The State Primary Board of the, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6245
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROSALIND KURITA
Defendant - Appellee: THE STATE PRIMARY BOARD OF THE TENNESSEE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, PAULA COMBS, official capacities as a members of the State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, et al., THE TENNESSEE DEMOCRATIC PARTY and others
Jason Johnson, et al v. Phil Bredesen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6106
Plaintiff: JASON ANDREW JOHNSON and TENNESSEE CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN JAY HOOKER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: PHIL BREDESEN, in his official capacity as the Govenor of the State of Tennessee, DALE H. TUTTLE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Tennessee Judicial Selection Commission and its remaining members in their official capacity as members of the Commission, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Tennessee and others
Jason Johnson, et al v. Phil Bredesen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6013
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON ANDREW JOHNSON
Plaintiff: TENNESSEE CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH and JOHN JAY HOOKER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: PHIL BREDESEN, in his official capacity as the Govenor of the State of Tennessee, DALE H. TUTTLE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Tennessee Judicial Selection Commission and its remaining members in their official capacity as members of the Commission, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Tennessee and others
East Brooks Books, Inc. v. Shelby County, Tennessee, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-5958
Plaintiff - Appellant: EAST BROOKS BOOKS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE and THE CITY OF MEMPHIS
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT E. COOPER, JR.
Entertainment Productions, Inc, et al v. Shelby County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-5494
Plaintiff - Appellant: ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, dba Christie's Cabaret, PLATINUM ROSE, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, dba Platinum Rose, 777 MEMPHIS, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, dba The Gold Club and others
Defendant - Appellee: SHELBY COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Tennessee and CITY OF MEMPHIS, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation
Intervenor - Appellee: ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?