Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Nigel Whittaker v. Matthew Obiden, et al
as 15-1899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIGEL WHITTAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW OBIDEN, Sergeant, PATRICK LAPOINTE, Correctional Officer, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as John Doe, Correctional Officer and others
USA v. Riley Lively
as 15-1671
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RILEY PATRICK LIVELY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-6322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Charles Fields v. Michael Martin, et al
as 14-2126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTIN, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden and GERALD RILEY
Defendant:
DAN LESATZ, et al
Nigel Whittaker v. Matthew Obiden, et al
as 14-1915
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIGEL WHITTAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW OBIDEN, Sergeant, PATRICK LAPOINTE, Correctional Officer, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as John Doe, Correctional Officer and others
Alrelio Evans v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 14-1595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALRELIO EVANS, (all similiarly situated prisoners) Other named Plaintiffs without signatures: D. Allison #416330, D. Settles #301268, K. Colvin Jr. #192744, C. West II #A237293,
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, Director, KENNETH MCGINNIS, Director, MIKE MARTIN, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Deandre Riley v. John Prelesnik
as 14-1570
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEANDRE RILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK
USA v. George Riley
as 14-3381
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
COMMODORE BANK and GARY E. BECKER
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE MICHAEL RILEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
