Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Glen Clayborn v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 13-5352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLEN CLAYBORN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, CHARLES TRAUGHBER, Chairman of the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole, JAMES AUSTIN, Parole Board Member and others
Eugene Szymanski v. Gary Zilli, et al
as 13-1138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE SZYMANSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY J. ZILLI, U S Probation Officer, et. al.,
Thomas Ridgeway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al
as 13-5027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RIDGEWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, MARSHALL COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT, MARSHALL COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Thomas Ridgeway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Corre, et al
as 12-6524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RIDGEWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, MARSHALL COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT, MARSHALL COUNTY JAIL and others
Terry Wilson v. Oakland County Probation Offic
as 12-2564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY LOUIS WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OAKLAND COUNTY PROBATION OFFICE
Jacobs Meeks v. Mark Luttrell, et al
as 12-6389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOBS MEEKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK LUTTRELL and STATE OF TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Robert Martin v. Reed, et al
as 12-4333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
REED, Clerk of Court for Ohio Court of Claims and LEISY, Judge, Probate Court for Wayne County
Roland Bessette v. Kent County Probate Court
as 12-2437
:
In re: JAMES PETER CROWLEY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLAND L. BESSETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT COUNTY PROBATE COURT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-6299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
