Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Michael Oko v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 23-3903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. OKO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH, OFFICER JOHN SMITH, originally named as Officer John Doe, OFFICER JOHN COMBS and others
Michael Oko v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 23-3880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. OKO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH, OFFICER JOHN SMITH, originally named as Officer John Doe, OFFICER JOHN COMBS and others
J. D. Littlejohn, III v. CoreCivic, et al
as 22-5973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. D. LITTLEJOHN, III
Defendant / Appellee:
CORECIVIC, DAMON T. HININGER, DAVID M. GARFINKLE and others
Charlie Bells, Jr. v. Rodget Sargent
as 22-5498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE BELLS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RODGET SARGENT
William Virgil v. City of Newport, KY, et al
as 21-5968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM R. VIRGIL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEWPORT, KY, et al., NORM WAGNER, Newport Police Officer, CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH and others
Defendant:
MARK BRANDT, CITY OF NORWOOD, OHIO, PAT MOORE and others
Nathaniel Jenkins v. John Davids, et al
as 21-1631
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL JENKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES) #1, named as several unknown Agents and a Nurse; Guards-Lieutenant-Sargent-Nurse and JOHN DAVIDS, Warden
James Duncan v. Anderson Cnty, TN, et al
as 21-5274
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT FENTON, DEPUTY ALLEN, CORPORAL ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DAVID DUNCAN
David Streety v. Daniel Grand, et al
as 20-2277
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF CONTRARAS, SARGENT MORAN, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of M.D.O.C. State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID STREETY
USA v. Jerry Sargent
as 20-5508
Defendant / Appellant:
JERRY LEE SARGENT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jerry SargentIn re: Jerry Sargent
as 19-5871
Petitioner:
In re: JERRY LEE SARGENT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
