Cases 1 - 10 of 1,530
Lance Pough v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 24-3975
Defendant:
MIKE DEWINE, Governor, FRITZ RAUSCHENBERG, Parole Board Member, OHIO PAROLE BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE POUGH
Elizabeth Kerwin v. Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital
as 24-1975
Respondent:
TRINITY HEALTH GRAND HAVEN HOSPITAL
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH K. KERWIN, Regional Director Seventh Region of the National Relations Board on behalf of National Labor Relations Board
Latausha Simmons v. Louis Swafford, et al
as 24-1962
Defendant:
ROSALYN DAWSON, Courtroom Clerk, LUTHER W. GLENN, JR., appointed side-counsel, MARLENA TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Bryan Pesta v. Cleveland State University, et al
as 24-3947
Defendant:
LAURA BLOOMBERG, in her individual and official capacity, WENDY REGOECZI, in her individual capacity, CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN PESTA
Lance Pough v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 24-3949
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, TRACY THALHEIMER, Chairperson, Ohio Parole Board and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE POUGH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5979
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Flavia Pichiorri v. Arthur Burghes, et al
as 24-3918
Defendant:
JILL RAFAEL-FORTNEY, ARTHUR BURGHES, JONATHAN DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
FLAVIA PICHIORRI, Ph. D.
Tina Zai v. National Credit Union Administration Board
as 24-3909
Plaintiff:
TINA ZAI, individually and as a Trustee of her Childrens' Trusts and STRETFORD, LTD.
Defendant:
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD, acting in its capacity as Liquidating Agent for the St. Paul Croatian Federal Credit Union
Alexander Amicucci v. Franklin County, OH Board of Elections
as 24-3908
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER Q. AMICUCCI
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
