Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Corey Broome v. James Schiebner
as 24-1143
Petitioner:
COREY DEQUAN BROOME
Respondent:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden
Romell Broom v. Tim Shoop
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-3356
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLOTTE JENKINS and TIM SHOOP, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROMELL BROOM
In re: Angelo Fears, et al v. John Kasich, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-3149
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO FEARS, RICHARD BAYS, ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
USA v. Anthony Broome
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-5691
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY BERNARD BROOME
Romell Broom v. Betty Mitchell
as 13-3739
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROMELL BROOM
Respondent - Appellee:
BETTY MITCHELL, Warden
Romell Broom v. Betty Mitchell
as 11-4300
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROMELL BROOM
Respondent - Appellee:
BETTY MITCHELL, Warden
Romell Broom v. Betty Mitchell
as 09-4125
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROMELL BROOM
Respondent - Appellee:
BETTY MITCHELL, Warden
Richard Cooey, II v. Ted Strickland, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-4200
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II
Intervenor - Appellant:
ROMELL BROOM
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND, et al.,
USA v. Timothy Broom
as 08-6085
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY BROOM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.