Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Anthony Forney v. Robert Cupp, et al
as 23-5063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY FORNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CUPP, Honorable, LISA N. RICE, Honorable, RUBIN RHEA, District Attorney and others
Mark Adams v. MI, et al
as 22-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ALAN ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MARY ADAMS SEMCKEN, SUSAN KAY ADAMS and others
Samson Orusa v. DEA
as 22-3132
Petitioner:
SAMSON KANLA ORUSA, M.D.
Respondent:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cincinnati Enquirer v. Dept of Justice, et al
as 21-3966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINCINNATI ENQUIRER, A division of Gannett GP Media, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Solomon Adu-Beniako v. Patrick Reimann, et al
as 21-2978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOLOMON ADU-BENIAKO
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK REIMANN and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Detroit
Lesly Pompy v. DEA
as 19-4090
Petitioner:
LESLY POMPY, M.D.
Respondent:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Tracy Micks-Harm, et al v. William Nichols, et al
as 19-2237
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HENDRICKS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, AARON OETJENS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SMALLWOOD, for Heidi Smallwood
Plaintiff:
TRACY CLARE MICKS-HARM, et al
Tracy Micks-Harm, et al v. William Nichols, et al
as 19-2228
Plaintiff:
TRACY CLARE MICKS-HARM
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HENDRICKS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, AARON OETJENS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANET ZUREKI
Tracy Micks-Harm, et al v. William Nichols, et al
as 19-2226
Plaintiff:
TRACY CLARE MICKS-HARM
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HENDRICKS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, AARON OETJENS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ANDREW SMITH, JR.
Tracy Micks-Harm, et al v. William Nichols, et al
as 19-2227
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HENDRICKS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, AARON OETJENS and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY CLARE MICKS-HARM, et al.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA MILLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
