Cases 1 - 9 of 9
John and Jane Doe No.1, et al v. Bethel Local School District Board of Education, et al
as 23-3740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN AND JANE DOE NO.1, Legal Guardians on behalf of Child No.1A, JOHN AND JANE DOE NO. 2, JOHN DOE NO. 3, Legal Guardian on behalf of Child No. 3B and Child No. 3C and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BETHEL LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, LYDDA MANSFIELD, In official capacity, LORI SEBASTIAN, In official capacity and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
ANNE ROE
Charles Elam v. Timothy Buchanan
as 19-3953
Respondent / Appellee:
TIMOTHY E. BUCHANAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES ELAM
Corey Burgess v. BOP, et al
as 14-5379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY BURGESS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOP, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DESIGNATION SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER, "DSCC" Office of Information Policy and others
Glenn Odom, II v. Gerald Helton, et al
as 13-6097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN D. ODOM, II
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD HELTON, KEVIN DENNIS, KEVIN WILLIAMS and others
USA v. Derwin Elam
as 12-1601
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DERWIN ELAM
James Farrell v. Harvey Elam Fair Value Apprais, et al
as 12-1580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FARRELL
Defendant:
HARVEY ELAM FAIR VALUE APPRAISAL SERVICES, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, MELANIE DEEDS and TROTT AND TROTT, PC
Christopher Elam v. Roger Binette, et al
as 10-3255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. ELAM
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. BINETTE, LAURA E. AIKIRE, JAMES H. YOUNG and others
Perry Elam v. Dhananjai Menzies
as 09-5360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERRY L. ELAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DHANANJAI MENZIES, MD
Elam & Miller, P.S.C. v. National City Bank of Kentucky, et al
as 07-6186
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ELAM & MILLER, P.S.C.
Defendant:
NATIONAL CITY BANK OF KENTUCKY
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATED MORTGAGE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
