Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant: VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Michael Townsend v. Deondre Esters, et al
as 23-1428
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL TOWNSEND
Defendant / Appellee: DEONDRE ESTERS, DMCARE EXPRESS, INC. and HORACE MANN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor: TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner: In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Lyle Heyward v. Heather Cooper, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-3781
Plaintiff / Appellant: LYLE M. HEYWARD
Defendant / Appellee: HEATHER COOPER, in their individual capacity, CHRIS LAMBERT, in their individual capacity, JAMES HAVILAND, Warden, in their individual capacity and others
Carlos Bush v. Dickerson, et al
as 16-6140
Plaintiff - Appellant: CARLOS M. BUSH
Defendant - Appellee: ASSISTANT WARDEN DICKERSON, CHIEF OF SECURITY VEAL, CAPTAIN ESTER and others
Rebeca Garcia-Mejia, et al v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-3129
Petitioner: REBECA ESTER GARCIA-MEJIA and IRMA YOLANDA MERIDA-GARCIA
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General
Charles Fields v. Cheryl Flanagan, et al
as 15-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee: CHERYL FLANAGAN, Account Teacher, LESLIE HOLTS, RUM, DONALD E. TRAMMELL, ARUS and others
Patricia Esch v. County of Kent, et al
as 15-1693
Plaintiff - Appellee: PATRICIA T. ESCH, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Steven Stiles, Deceased, aka Stephen Stiles, aka Mary Owens
Defendant: COUNTY OF KENT, LAWRENCE A. STELMA, Sheriff, NASIM A. YACOB, Dr. and others
Defendant - Appellant: PAUL RODRIGUEZ, Deputy, JEFF SULLIVAN, Deputy and JOSHUA DOCK, Deputy
Patricia Esch v. County of Kent, et al
as 15-1652
Plaintiff - Appellee: PATRICIA T. ESCH, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Steven Stiles, Deceased, aka Stephen Stiles, aka Mary Owens
Defendant - Appellant: COUNTY OF KENT, LAWRENCE A. STELMA, Sheriff, PAUL RODRIGUEZ, Deputy and others
Defendant: DAVID SOVA, Dr.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?