Cases 1 - 10 of 85
John Allen v. USA, et al
as 24-3431
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JONATHAN M. MORRIS and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Commisioner
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. ALLEN
Mawule Tepe v. IRS, et al
as 24-5261
Plaintiff:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IRS, et alIn re: IRS, et al
as 24-301
Petitioner:
In re: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DANNY WERFEL, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Respondent:
BUCKEYE INSTITUTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CIC Services, LLC v. IRS, et al
as 23-5886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CIC SERVICES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John McLeod v. Michael Bryant, et al
as 23-1721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL MCLEOD
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BRYANT, Revenue Agent and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Charles Rettig, Commissioner
Dan Carman, et al v. Janet Yellen, et al
as 23-5662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAN CARMAN, COIN CENTER, RAYMOND WALSH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET YELLEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, CHARLES PAUL RETTIG, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and others
Wally Mahar v. CIR, et al
as 23-1629
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLY SHERMAN MAHAR
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cassandra Noles v. IRS, et al
as 22-6064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSANDRA L. NOLES
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Regions Bank v. Donnie Fletcher, et al
as 22-5725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGIONS BANK
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNIE FLETCHER, DENNIS FLETCHER, NATIONAL LOAN INVESTORS, L.P. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
