Cases 1 - 5 of 5
William Myre, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1489
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM MYRE, Estate of TM, Co-Personal Representative, SHERI MYRE, Estate of TM, Co-Personal Representative, TM, Estate of and others
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIMOTHY THRONE, Superintendent, STEVEN WOLF, Principal and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Jeffrey Franz, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1483
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY FRANZ, Individually and as Next Friend as to RF and BF, minors, BRANDI FRANZ, Individually and as Next Friend as to RF and BF, minors, RF, a Minor, By Next Friends Jeffrey Franz and Brandi Franz and others
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIMOTHY THRONE, Superintendent, STEVEN WOLF, Principal and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Nicholette Asciutto, et al v. Oxford Community School District, et al
as 23-1484
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NICHOLETTE ASCIUTTO, as Next Friend to JA and AA, minor children, JOHN VACKARO, as Next Friend of MV, a minor child, JA, a minor by Next Friend Nicholette Asciutto and others
Defendant:
OXFORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, STEVEN WOLF, Principal, TIMOTHY THRONE, Superintendent and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS EJAK, Dean of Students and SHAWN HOPKINS, Student Counselor
Tony Beard, Jr., et al v. Eric Hawkins, et al
as 16-2719
Plaintiff:
TONY DEWAYNE BEARD, JR., by Johnette Ford, Personal Representative and Guardian
Appellant:
JOHNNY L HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON SCHNEIDER, JEFFREY JAGILESKI, KATE SCHNEIDER and others
Defendant:
ERIC HAWKINS
David Rawls v. City of Euclid, et al
as 10-4099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID R. RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF EUCLID, CLEVELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, EUCLID POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
