Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Attica Scott, et alIn re: Attica Scott, et al
as 24-501
Petitioner:
In re: ATTICA SCOTT, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, CORBIN SMITH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, KAYLA MEISNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT, GREG FISCHER, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Louisville, KY, ROBERT SCHROEDER, individually and in his official capacity as Interim Chief of the Louisville Metropolitan Police Department and others
Jarrus Ransom v. Cory Evans, et al
as 23-5919
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JARRUS RANSOM
Defendant:
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT, dba Louisville Metro Police Department, KYLE CARROLL, In his individual and official capacity as a Louisville Metro Police Officer and UNKNOWN DEFENDANT OFFICERS, In their individual and official capacities as Louisville Metro Police Officers
Defendant / Appellant:
CORY EVANS, In his individual and official capacity as a Louisville Metro Police Officer and SARAH NICOLAS, In her individual and official capacity as a Louisville Metro Police Officer
Roy Stucker, et al v. Louisville Metro Government, et al
as 23-5214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY STUCKER and COURTNEY BROWN-PORTER, on behalf of herself and as guardian and next friend of her minor child, S.W.
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, UNKNOWN METRO POLICE OFFICERS and WESLEY TROUTMAN
Antonio Sanderson v. Steven Healey, et al
as 23-5077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO DESHAWN SANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE STEVEN HEALEY, #2444, in his individual and official capacity, LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Sisters for Life, Inc., et al v. Louisville-Jefferson County, KY Metro Government, et al
as 22-5150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SISTERS FOR LIFE, INC., ANGELA MINTER and KENTUCKY RIGHT TO LIFE ASSOCIATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HARPRING and MARY KENNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT, GREG FISCHER, Mayor, ERIKA SHIELDS, Chief of Police, Louisville Metro Police Department and others
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Sisters for Life, Inc., et al v. Louisville-Jefferson County, KY Metro Government, et al
as 22-5151
Plaintiff:
SISTERS FOR LIFE, INC., ANGELA MINTER and KENTUCKY RIGHT TO LIFE ASSOCIATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD HARPRING and MARY KENNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT
Defendant:
GREG FISCHER, Mayor, ERIKA SHIELDS, Chief of Police, Louisville Metro Police Department and MIKE O'CONNELL
Lawrence Wright v. Louisville Metro Police Dept, et al
as 21-6205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER E. BURNETT
Reinella Kirilova, et al v. Russel Braun, et al
as 21-5649
Plaintiff:
REINELLA S. KIRILOVA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HALL, as Administratrix of the Estate of William Allen Young, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
RUSSEL BRAUN, Individually and in the Official Capacity as a Louisville Metro Police Officer, RANDALL RICHARDSON, Individually and in the Official Capacity as a Louisville Metro Police Officer, PAIGE YOUNG, Individually and as a Member of the Louisville Metro Police and others
Lawrence Wright v. Louisville Metro Police Dept, et al
as 21-5394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH NETT and OFFICER JOSEPH NETT
Louisville Jefferson Cnty, et alIn re: Louisville Jefferson Cnty, et al
as 21-503
Petitioner:
VANESSA BURNS, individually and in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ASSETS LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, In re: LOUISVILLE JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT and STEVE CONRAD, individually and in his official capacity as CHIEF of the LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Respondent:
TYROME LOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
