Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
King Kevin v. Daviess County Sherriffs Department, et al
as 23-5794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KING KEVIN, aka George Kevin Quinn
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVIESS COUNTY SHERRIFFS DEPARTMENT, OWENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY EDWARDS, Officer and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 22-6103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Leonard Cousino v. Township of Marshall, et al
as 22-2008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD J. COUSINO
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF MARSHALL, a public body corporate, PAUL ANDERSON, an individual, MICHELLE L. RICHARDSON, P57485, and individual and others
Carl Bennett v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL BENNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON ALLEGIANCE HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, staff involved in surgery and others
In re: Quinn James
as 22-1846
Petitioner:
In re: QUINN ANTHONY JAMES
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
