Cases 1 - 10 of 22
In re: Richard Duerson
as 24-5211
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD C. DUERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Reese, et al v. Nicholas Akins, et al
as 23-3349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. REESE, Derivatively and on behalf of American Electric Power Company Inc.
Appellant:
DAVID SPEISER
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS K. AKINS, BRIAN X. TIERNEY, THOMAS E. HOAGLIN and others
Jennifer McFarland, et al v. USA
as 23-5288
Petitioner:
JENNIFER G. MCFARLAND
Appellant:
RICHARD C. DUERSON, as next friend of Jennifer McFarland
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard Duerson v. USA
as 23-5219
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD C. DUERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard Poe, II, et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 22-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD C. POE, II, DICK POE MOTORS, LP and DICK POE DODGE, LP
Defendant / Appellee:
FCA US, LLC
Brandon Wright v. Sandra Donaghy, et al
as 22-5089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON LOYS WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE SANDRA DONAGHY, STEPHEN D. CRUMP, Attorney General and RICHARD C. HUGHES, Public Defender Director
Monclova Christian Academy, et al v. Toledo-Lucas Cnty Health Dept
as 20-4300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY VALUES, dba Ohio Christian Education Association, MONCLOVA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, EMMANUEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOLEDO-LUCAS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Amicus Curiae:
CAROLINE MALA CORBIN, RICHARD C. SCHRAGGER, MICHAEL C. DORF and others
Lance Goldman v. Consumers Credit Union, et al
as 17-1700
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSUMERS CREDIT UNION, KALAMAZOO, COUNTY OF, RICHARD C. FULLER, III, Sheriff and others
Earnest Lanier v. Richard Fuller, III, et al
as 17-1554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST LANIER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD C. FULLER, III, Kalamazoo County Sheriff, KALAMAZOO, COUNTY OF, CITY OF KALAMAZOO, MI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
