Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Richmond Road Partners, LLC, et al v. City of Warrensville Heights, OH, et al
as 24-3502
Plaintiff:
RICHMOND ROAD PARTNERS, LLC and STEP FORWARD
Defendant:
CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH, CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH BUILDING COMMISSIONER
Derick Damrell v. Madison County Detention Center, et al
as 24-5205
Plaintiff:
DERICK DAMRELL
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT and FACILITY & MEDICAL STAFF
Alexandra Yonkov v. Maximus Holding Group LLC, et al
as 24-3056
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA YONKOV, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Maximus Holding Group LLC
Defendant:
MAXIMUS HOLDING GROUP LLC, BRICKHAUS MANAGEMENT, INC., ANDREW E. BRICKMAN and others
Darrell Richmond v. Michael Mosley, et al
as 23-1643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL RICHMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER MICHAEL MOSLEY, in his Individual and Representative Capacity and CITY OF DETROIT, MI, a Municipal entity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Linnell Richmond, Jr.
as 22-5236
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LINNELL RICHMOND, JR.
Gregory Ackerman, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 22-1056
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ACKERMAN, DANIEL E. BALCER, BECKER FARMS, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ACKERMAN BROTHERS FARMS, LLC, ACKERMAN & SON, LLC, BACK ROAD FARMING, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY and FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION
Linnell Richmond, Jr.In re: Linnell Richmond, Jr.
as 21-5412
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: LINNELL RICHMOND, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
