Cases 1 - 10 of 25
USA v. William Wheat, Jr.
as 22-3472
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WHEAT, JR.
JoEllen Crossett v. Emmet County, MI, et al
as 20-1268
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL H. SCHUITEMA, Assistant Prosecutor, STUART FENTON, Assistant Prosecutor, WADE LEIST, Sheriff Deputy/Detective and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOELLEN MARY CROSSETT
Jeffrey Prater v. James Linderman, et al
as 19-2485
Defendant / Appellee:
IRENE DAVIS, Sheriff Deputy, in her official and individual capacities, JENNIFER KRUSSELL, Sheriff Deputy, JAMES R. LINDERMAN, Emmet County Prosecuting Attorney in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY BERNARD PRATER
USA v. William Wheat, Jr.
as 19-4172
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WHEAT, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Wheat
as 16-6816
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL BOYD WHEAT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wayne Wheat v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 14-3911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE L. WHEAT
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, MATTHEW COX, UNKNOWN OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derrick Wheat v. Maggie Bradshaw
as 13-3387
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK WHEAT
Respondent - Appellee:
MAGGIE BRADSHAW
Thomas Thorp v. Mike Wheat, et al
as 12-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS G. THORP
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE WHEAT, Detective for Charlevoix County Sheriff Department, MARY BETH KUR, Former Prosecutor for Charlevoix County (2003-04), JENNIFER DEEGAN, former Assistant Prosecutor for Charlevois County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
