Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv00110
Petitioner:
John Ross White
Respondent:
John Gilley and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shannon et al v. Burberry et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon, Jeff Tucker, William Peters and others
Defendant:
West Burberry and Bourbon County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v. Peters
as 6:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Darius Jermaine Green and Carl Haskell
Defendant:
Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Carosone et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Warren Smith
Defendant:
Peter Carusone, Russell , Sye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2017cv00347
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Walker
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, FMC Lexington, Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Georgacarakos v. Warden et al
as 6:2016cv00105
Petitioner:
Peter N. Georgacarakos
Respondent:
Ray Ormond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cassinelli v. Flournoy
as 6:2015cv00121
Petitioner:
Peter A. Cassinelli
Respondent:
V. J. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carter v. McClure et al
as 5:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Bernard C. Carter
Defendant:
N. McClure, Tammy Hicks, Donna Stivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittington v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
Peter Whittington
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
