Cases 141 - 150 of 3,954
Heath v. Boom et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan Heath
Defendant:
District Judge Claria H. Boom and James J. Vilt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Farley
as 3:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
Jim Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Forte v. City of Hopkinsville, et al
as 5:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, The Hopkinsville Police Dept and B. ODonnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Snider v. City of Lyndon et al
as 3:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Brandin Snider
Defendant:
City of Lyndon, City of Lyndon Police Department, Robert Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diehl v. AutoZoners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Diehl
Defendant:
AutoZoners, LLC and Brad Welch Jakubcani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lang v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Rodney G. Lang, Sr.
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Louisville Metropolitan Police Department, Officer M. Forbes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
