Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Cases 11 - 20 of 14,028
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10970
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Hill v. Provident Asset Management LLC
as 5:2024cv11500
Plaintiff: Spring Hill
Defendant: Provident Asset Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Brush v. Grosse Pointe Public School System et al
as 2:2024cv11495
Plaintiff: Mary Anne Brush
Defendant: Grosse Pointe Public School System, Ahmed Ismail, Lisa Papas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11494
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Goldman-Brown v. Consumers Energy
as 2:2024cv10902
Plaintiff: Danielle Goldman-Brown
Defendant: Consumers Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller v. Consumers Energy
as 5:2024cv10935
Plaintiff: Chad Miller
Defendant: Consumers Energy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Boyd v. Genesee, County of et al
as 2:2024cv10893
Plaintiff: George Boyd
Defendant: County of Genesee, Sheriff Christopher Swanson, Deputy Robert Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11486
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11487
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11485
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?