Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jadama v. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director of et al
as 2:2022cv12682
Petitioner:
Buba Jadama
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director of and others
Alfred v. U.S. Director, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 2:2022cv12591
Petitioner:
Kamran Arthur Alfred
Respondent:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcment and Director, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Doobay v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv12007
Petitioner:
Karamchand Doobay
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Martinez-Hernandez v. Adducci et al
as 4:2020cv10966
Defendant:
Detroit Field Office Rebecca Adducci, Chad Wolf, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Martinez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Chirchir v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2014cv13231
Plaintiff:
David Chirchir
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Yohannes v. United States Attorney General
as 2:2011cv14977
Petitioner:
Getachew Yohannes
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director of, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Field Office Director of, John Doe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv11783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hugues v. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 5:2011cv11566
Petitioner:
Kouadid Hugues
Respondent:
Attorney General, Department of Homeland Security, Chippewa County Jail and others
Mbacke v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 2:2010cv14488
Petitioner:
Cheikh Mbacke
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
