Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Jones v. Cruz et al
as 3:2008cv01444
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Jones
Defendant:
A. Cruz, Det. Clark, D. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc. et al v. Sartini et al
as 1:2007cv03190
Plaintiff:
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., Vine Street New, Inc., Nu Philly Video/News, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Thomas Sartini, Katharine Lang Bettasso, David Lambros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCullaugh et al v. Office of County Executive Summit County et al
as 5:2007cv02341
Plaintiff:
Mark D. McCullaugh, Sr., Mark D. McCullaugh, Sr., Jennifer L. Fox and others
Defendant:
Office of County Executive Summit County, Stephen Krendick, Jason Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Husband v. Clarke Power Products, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00552
Plaintiff:
Sandra Husband
Defendant:
Clarke Power Products, Inc. and Clarke Power Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Austin et al v. Wilkinson et al
as 4:2001cv00071
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Austin , Michael Benge , Alonzo L. Bonner and others
Defendant:
Reginald Wilkinson , Stephen J Huffman , Bernard J. Ryznar and others
Interested_party:
Anthony M. Hoepf, Raymond Mefford, Derrick Scott Newmann and others
Movant:
Dave Easley, Eugene Groves, James T. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
