Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Carey v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 1:2016cv01058
Plaintiff:
Duane Carey
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stotler et al v. Selfridge Leasing, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv01491
Plaintiff:
Carey D Stotler , Christina L Ketchum and Michael W Barnhart
Defendant:
Selfridge Leasing, LLC , Providence Healthcare Management, Inc. and Eli Gunzburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DeWitt v. State of Ohio
as 3:2014cv01659
Plaintiff:
Carey DeWitt
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Ray Carey
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carey v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2014mc00006
Petitioner:
Kevin D. Carey
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Fleet Tire, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00474
Plaintiff:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Defendant:
Fleet Tire, Inc., Craig Brannon and Carey Cumberlege
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
DeWitt v. Local 86 United Auto Workers Union et al
as 3:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Carey E DeWitt
Defendant:
Local 86 United Auto Workers Union , Daniel Miller , Matthew P Buehrer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Johnson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23015
Plaintiff:
Timothy R Johnson and Carey Johnson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wisell et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22881
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Wisell and Carey A. Wisell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
