Cases 81 - 90 of 7,462
Shade v. Warden Franklin County Corrections Center II
as 2:2024cv02694
Respondent:
Warden Franklin County Corrections Center II
Petitioner:
O'Bryan Shade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wolfe v. Streck
as 3:2024cv00164
Defendant:
Rob Streck
Plaintiff:
Jason Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Olabode et al
as 2:2024cv02755
Defendant:
Kelle Gapen, Jim Hildreth, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Plaintiff:
William Edward Harley Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVENPORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02838
Defendant:
DANEL J. CABLE, ANDY D. MILLER, BRAD THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN R. DAVENPORT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATHMAN v. HOLBROOK
as 2:2024cv03649
Defendant:
MICHEAL HOLBROOK
Plaintiff:
LADERAL A.C. HATHMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Braunskill v. Brown County Sheriff Dept
as 1:2024cv00374
Defendant:
Brown County Sheriff Dept
Plaintiff:
Ralphiell Braunskill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burks v. McAllister et al
as 1:2024cv00375
Defendant:
Sgt. Dillon, Sgt. J Chinn, C/O Matt Keatin and others
Plaintiff:
Jamual Burks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATHMAN v. HOLBROOK
as 2:2024cv03209
Petitioner:
LADERAL A.C. HATHMAN
Respondent:
MICHEAL HOLBROOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Titus v. Davis
as 2:2024cv02641
Respondent:
Cynthia Davis
Petitioner:
Timothy Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03219
Respondent:
David C Young, Scott A Smith, COLIN E. PETERS and others
Petitioner:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
