Cases 41 - 50 of 743
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Maddox v. Foley et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Clarice M Maddox
Defendant:
Mike Foley, Mary Kathrine Huffman, Timothy O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nationwide Children's Hospital v. The Raymath Company et al
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Defendant:
The Raymath Company, The Raymath Company Health Plan, J. P. Farley Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rapa v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Frank P Rapa
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oliver v. Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas et al
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tanyqua Oliver
Defendant:
Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Robert P. Ruelman and Sue Selegean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Paul P. Brown
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. LAWSON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pierce v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
BRIAN P. PIERCE
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. ADAMS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
