Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Johnson v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01527
Plaintiff:
Joan Johnson
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and corrections, Lebanon Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
McCoy v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Darcy McCoy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fox v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01620
Plaintiff:
Darci Fox
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duberger v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Darcy Duberger
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Willis v. ODRC (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections) et al
as 2:2022cv01823
Plaintiff:
Domanshay Willis
Defendant:
ODRC (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections), Officer C. Garvey, Officer Hammonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04250
Plaintiff:
Darcy Adkins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. Wiedman et al
as 2:2021cv01876
Plaintiff:
Jerry R. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Darci Moore, Matthew Wiedman, David Andy Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Wiedimen et al
as 2:2021cv01177
Plaintiff:
Anthony Levi Nelson
Defendant:
Steven P. Bethard, Matthew T. Wiedimen and Darci Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Pontias et al
as 2:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
John William Moore
Defendant:
Matt Weidman, Darci Moore and Victor Pontias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
