Cases 121 - 130 of 6,329
Cox v. Farmer et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Cox
Defendant:
Joseph Farmer, Frank Strada, Beathany Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. USA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Demonte Crayton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gray v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00453
Petitioner:
Jerry Rommell Gray
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kurtz v. Broome County's Northern District of The United States District Court
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
T Kurtz
Defendant:
Broome County's Northern District of The United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batts v. USA
as 3:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Kaylon M Batts
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Estes v. Hacker et al
as 2:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Donald Eric Estes
Defendant:
Hacker, Ridenour, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore et al v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Joshua Moore, James W. Clark, Jr., Dalmar Mack and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Gregory Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. USA
as 2:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Jody W Compton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hopper v. Prince et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Hopper
Defendant:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing, Charles Ricket and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hitchcock v. USA
as 2:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Tyrone Lamas Hitchcock
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
