Cases 11 - 20 of 27,729
Fountain Equipment Finance, LLC v. Elk Grove Truck Sales, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Fountain Equipment Finance, LLC
Defendant:
Elk Grove Truck Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Beam v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Beam
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00250
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gilliland v. Keystone Multisite Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jordan Gilliland
Defendant:
Keystone Multisite Solutions LLC and Melissa Key
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Yates v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Nancy Renee Yates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HEPSCO, Inc. v. United States Stove Company
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
HEPSCO, Inc. an Illinois corporation doing business as Professional Sales & Service
Defendant:
United States Stove Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Satterfield v. Lauderdale
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Margaret Hill Satterfield
Defendant:
Angie K. Lauderdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
McCroskey v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gary McCroskey
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00095
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
