Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,609
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe (HWB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff: John Doe (HWB)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff: Marcia Jordan
Defendant: Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Doe #60 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: John Doe #60
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacy v. Clarksville Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff: Dylan Stacy
Defendant: Clarksville Police Department, City of Clarksville and Jamal Alquzweeni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nitschke et al v. Berry Farms APT Investments, LP et al
as 3:2024cv00466
Plaintiff: Chelsie Nitschke and Cynthia George
Defendant: Berry Farms APT Investments, LP, DeAngelis Diamond Construction, LLC and Boyle Investment Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Taliaferro v. HCA et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff: Linda Taliaferro
Defendant: HCA and HCA Centennial Head and Neck Surgery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?