Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Doe 1 et al v. State of Tennessee, The et al
as 3:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, The, Tennessee Department of Children's Services, The, Margie Quin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Sr.
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (PDB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
John Doe (PDB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (JDC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
John Doe (JDC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Old School Sales, LLC et al v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Old School Sales, LLC doing business as Old School Vapor and Sak Wholesale, LLC
Defendant:
Brent Cooper, Don Brite, Andrew Burdett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #068 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
John Doe #068
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #067 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Doe #067
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 MLC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Doe #066
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
