Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Quality Liaison Services of North America, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Leroy Bernard
Defendant:
Quality Liaison Services of North America, Inc. and QLS Unlimited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cartwright v. Estate of Delbert Leroy Peterson, Jr. et al
as 3:2017cv01464
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Peterson Cartwright
Defendant:
Estate of Delbert Leroy Peterson, Jr. and Deborah Ann Colvin Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
William Leroy Hines, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hall v. Christian Education, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00648
Plaintiff:
Leroy Calvin Hall
Defendant:
Christian Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Brimmer v. Westbrooks et al
as 3:2015cv00558
Plaintiff:
Leroy Brimmer
Defendant:
David Bruce Westbrooks, Chris Aibangbee, William Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Chrysler Group LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00987
Plaintiff:
Leroy Hudson
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC , New Venture Gear, Inc., New Process Gear, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
David Leroy Lee
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 (Phoenix) and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv00963
Petitioner:
Ernest Leroy Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
