Cases 11 - 20 of 2,364
Jones v. Simpson et al
as 2:2024cv02452
Defendant:
City of Bartlett Police Department and Thomas Wayne Simpson
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
Ester Moore
Defendant:
Bobby Grandberry, Shelby County Government, Wanda Halbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McCurdy v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv02453
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Ralph Lucus McCurdy and R. L. McCurdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taylor v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02591
Plaintiff:
Cedric Taylor
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sherwood v. City of Gleason, TN et al
as 1:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Alex Sherwood
Defendant:
City of Gleason, TN, Charles Anderson and Marcus Hopper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rudd v. Christoff et al
as 2:2024cv02504
Defendant:
Wendy R. Oliver, Judge Annie T. Christoff and Tennessee Bar Association
Plaintiff:
Latanua Rudd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore v. Komatsu America Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv02419
Defendant:
Komatsu America Corp. and Amber Pugh
Plaintiff:
Darrin Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stooksbury v. Relient Standard Insurance (TV1)
as 1:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Howard Q Stooksbury
Respondent:
Relient Standard Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Liu v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02413
Defendant:
Lynuel Dennis, Alejandro Mayorkas and Attorney General Merrick Garland
Plaintiff:
Xiang Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Merritt v. Wagner
as 2:2024cv02574
Defendant:
Judge Mary Wagner
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
