Cases 101 - 110 of 7,294
Perry v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01051
Petitioner:
Cordetrick Montrelle Perry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Douglas v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Douglas
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Chance Leeds and Latoya Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01023
Petitioner:
Andre Perkins
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bannister v. Naveed
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
Waylon Bannister
Defendant:
Gill Naveed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Fitz
as 1:2024cv01007
Petitioner:
David A. Avery
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Webb v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Webb
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Jeffery Smith, Jackie Bausman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baine v. Weaver et al
as 1:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jason Baine
Defendant:
Clyde Weaver, Steven Whitlock and Decatur County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pankey v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
Jaycent Pankey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Morris v. Genovese
as 2:2024cv02003
Petitioner:
Curtis Morris
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese, Warden and Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
