Cases 141 - 150 of 24,874
Lipscomb v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Chason Lipscomb
Defendant:
FNU Shetley, Brian Eller and FNU Swallow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
Zachary Michael Johnson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Weatherford v. Brunson et al
as 1:2024cv00077
Defendant:
S. Preciado, f/n/u Rowland, J. Brunson and others
Plaintiff:
John Michael Weatherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02566
Petitioner:
Decardo Moore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Blevins v. Holzapel
as 2:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Jerry Blevins
Respondent:
Warden Holzapel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morgan v. Haywood County General Sessions Court et al
as 1:2024cv01164
Defendant:
FNU Elston, Haywood County Jail, Haywood County General Sessions Court and others
Plaintiff:
Justice Clyde Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Williamson County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2024cv00981
Defendant:
Williamson County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Keisean Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fitts v. Scott et al
as 3:2024cv00982
Defendant:
Brandon Maynard, Owen Harrington and Jerry Scott
Plaintiff:
Lamarcus Fitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv02477
Petitioner:
Ronald Curry
Respondent:
Warden Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
