Cases 51 - 60 of 24,534
Gomez-Castro v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner:
Luis Gomez-Castro
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Farmer v. Parris
as 3:2024cv00563
Petitioner:
Keith Lemont Farmer
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Toby Whitaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Liles
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Medical Department, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clum v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
David Clum, Jr.
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luther v. Chochran et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Jayson Lance Luther
Defendant:
Chochran, Dorton and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Wardlow
as 4:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
BILLY JOE NELSON
Respondent:
JERRY WARDLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
