Cases 11 - 20 of 5,916
Stephens v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Tina Stephens
Counter Claimant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Stepanoff et al v. Bite Ninja, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stepanoff, Bradley McKinney, Ryan P. Cooper and others
Defendant:
Bite Ninja, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Norwood v. Mulberry Medical Aesthetics, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Norwood
Defendant:
Mulberry Medical Aesthetics, LLC and Theron Hutton, MD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Clark v. Reda et al
as 3:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Lauren Clark
Defendant:
Rick Reda and Reda Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hardaway v. Wingmann, LLC
as 2:2024cv02388
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hardaway
Defendant:
Wingmann, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carlyle v. Stryker Employment Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
John Carlyle
Defendant:
Stryker Employment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gilliland v. Keystone Multisite Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jordan Gilliland
Defendant:
Keystone Multisite Solutions LLC and Melissa Key
McCain et al v. Energy Mat Alliance, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Michael McCain, James D. Hornsby and Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Energy Mat Alliance, LLC and Steven Rooker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
McCroskey v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gary McCroskey
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00095
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
