Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Rover Pipeline LLC v. 1.23 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVITUDE), AND 3.74 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, Office of the Lenawee C et al
as 2:2017cv10365
Defendant:
1.23 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVITUDE), AND 3.74 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, Office of the Lenawee C, 2.14 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVITUDE), AND 4.53 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, Waterland Farms, LLC Tr, Michael P. Croghan and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
RSG Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way For an Access Road Over 1.39 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Campbell County, Tennessee et al (PLR1)
as 3:2016cv00578
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way For an Access Road Over 1.39 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Campbell County, Tennessee and Benjamin Christopher Arnold
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way for an Access Road Over 0.755 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Campbell County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00579
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way for an Access Road Over 0.755 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Campbell County, Tennessee, B.C. Arnold Holdings and Malicote Family, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
