Cases 71 - 80 of 200
Shoffner v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
Penny Shoffner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphree v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02630
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Murphree
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Sherry Hale and Howard Hale
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00731
Plaintiff:
Gloria M. Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kieffer v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Anne Kieffer
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
Marilyn J. Lee
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
Jill Victoria Armstrong
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2012cv00051
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Brown and Norman Brown
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Annette Chapman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00413
Plaintiff:
Harriet Cammile Griffin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
