Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Harper v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02156
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Harper
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harper v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00354
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Susan Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. C.R. Bard Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv00758
Plaintiff:
Tammy Harper
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C.R. Bard Inc., Does 1 through 100, Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00605
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joyce Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03983
Plaintiff:
Dawn Harper
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martha Castellanos et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Martha Castellanos , Robert Foster , Kathy Franklin and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
G'Fransisco v. GoFit, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01084
Plaintiff:
Mark A. G'Fransisco
Defendant:
GoFit, LLC , Bob Harper Enterprises, Academy LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Harper, et al v. Eli Lilly and Company, et al
as 13-5387
:
In re: DARVOCET, DARVON, AND PROPOXYPHENE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HARPER and JAN HARPER, his wife
Defendant - Appellee:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., QUALITEST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Harper v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Larry Harper
Defendant:
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
