Cases 1 - 10 of 23
v. Gibbs et al
as 2:2022cv12668
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gibbs
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Agency and Julia Dale
Rasmussen et al v. Davol et al
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
MAURICE RASMUSSEN and RISSIA MONIQUE RASMUSSEN
Defendant:
Davol and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Betts v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maurice Betts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibbs v. Oakland County Friend of Court
as 2:2019cv12249
Defendant:
Oakland County Friend of Court
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gibbs
Glover v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01428
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Maurice Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phyllis Bechtold, et al v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 16-4210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHYLLIS BECHTOLD, CATHY BEIL, NANCY BEGLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC.
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 1:2016cv00918
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bechtold et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Bechtold , Cathy Beil, Nancy Begley and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brady v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
Victoria Lee Brady and Maurice Joseph Brady
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
