Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Ash v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ruppel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Clyde Ruppel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gunter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Clyde Gunter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05639
Plaintiff:
Clyde Moore and Danita Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leeper v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05006
Plaintiff:
Clyde R Leeper
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peffly v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv05700
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Clyde Peffly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04600
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lafferty v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02903
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lafferty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins v. Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2019cv00048
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Torrent Private Limited, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mackey et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02111
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Evelyn Mackey and Clyde Mackey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
