Cases 41 - 50 of 628
Croce v. Sotheby's Financial Services Inc et al
as 2:2023cv02896
Plaintiff:
Carlo M Croce
Defendant:
Sotheby's Financial Services Inc, Sotheby"s Corporation, Sotheby's FinancialServices California Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Embert, on behalf of herself, her minor child, KG, and all others similarly situated v. CareSource
as 3:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Rachel Embert, on behalf of herself, her minor child, KG, and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
CareSource
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Willis v. CareSource
as 3:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Channon Willis
Defendant:
CareSource
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Stevens v. CareSource
as 3:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Stevens
Defendant:
CareSource
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Campo v. CareSource
as 3:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Thomas Campo
Defendant:
CareSource
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Cooper v. Caresource
as 3:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Cooper
Defendant:
Caresource
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hudson v. Cornwell Quality Tools Company
as 1:2023cv01887
Plaintiff:
William Hudson
Defendant:
Cornwell Quality Tools Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
In re Wasserstrom Holdings, Inc. Data Breach Litigation
as 2:2023cv02070
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gruscinski
Defendant:
Wasserstrom Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Tate v. EyeMed Vision Care, LLC
as 1:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Chandra Tate, Barbara Whittom and Alexus Wynn
Defendant:
EyeMed Vision Care, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Felger v. Cornwell Quality Tools Company
as 1:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
James Felger
Defendant:
The Cornwell Quality Tools Company and Cornwell Quality Tools Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
