Antitrust Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ford Motor Company v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv11286
Plaintiff: Ford Motor Company
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company and The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
Petitioner: Felix Brizuela
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court: In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2012md02311
Plaintiff: A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc., AGA Realty LLC, Ifeoma Adams and others
Defendant: AB SKF, ALPS Electric (North America), Inc., Alps Automotive, Inc. and others
Interested Party: American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Timmy A. Curtis, Sherman Bearings, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Thomas Saris, Jim Sciaroni and others
Petitioner: Sandra Singer and David Dishman
Respondent: Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc.
In Re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Special Master: Gene J. Esshaki
Intervenor: Financial Recovery Services, LLC and United States of America
Claimant: Certain End-Payor Settlement Class Members and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
Wire Harness - Direct Purchaser Actions
as 2:2012cv00101
Defendant: FURUKAWA WIRING SYSTEMS AMERICA, INC., Furukawa Electric Company, Limited, American Furukawa, Inc. and others
In Re: Wire Harness - Direct Purchaser Actions
Plaintiff: Martinez Manufacturing, Inc., Mexican Industries In Michigan, Incorporated, T.M. MORRIS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. and others
Petitioner: Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.
Interested Party: Wire Harness-Dealership Plaintiffs, Mitsuba Corporation, American Mitsuba Corporation and others
Wire Harness - Lead Case
as 2:2012cv00100
Plaintiff: Ifeoma Adams, Jude Anheluk, Archer-Perdue, Inc., d/b/a Archer-Perdue Suzuki and others
Defendant: American Furukawa, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG and others
In Re: Wire Harness - Lead Case
Interested Party: Mitsuba Corporation and American Mitsuba Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Grupo Antolin North America, Incorporated
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019md02901
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Matthew Smith, Ryan Combs, Al Balls and others
In Re: Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Garza et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019cv12895
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Quizhpi and Rosalynda Garza
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Kaloustian v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019cv13197
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Kaloustian
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
NAPIER v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2019cv12437
Plaintiff: Mark Napier
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
FENCL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2019cv12438
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Keith Fencl
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?