Cases 81 - 90 of 530
Rothstein v. Michigan First Credit Union
as 2:2017cv13045
Plaintiff:
Alan Rothstein
Defendant:
Michigan First Credit Union
Majestic Building Maintenance v. Huntington Bancshares Inc.
as 16-4342
Defendant / Appellee:
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED, dba Huntington National Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAJESTIC BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC.
City of Detroit v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
as 2:2017cv12619
Plaintiff:
City of Detroit
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ary v. Midfirst Bank et al
as 3:2017cv00948
Plaintiff:
Ahlam K. Ary
Defendant:
Midfirst Bank and Weiss & Cummins, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gagoh et al v. M&T Bank et al
as 2:2017cv10867
Plaintiff:
Oscar Gagoh and Lydia Gagoh
Defendant:
M&T Bank and Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Chakifah v. Comerica Bank
as 2:2017cv10860
Defendant:
Comerica Bank
Plaintiff:
Adnan Chakifah
Counter_claimant:
Comerica Bank
Counter_defendant:
Adnan Chakifah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Courtney Jordan v. Comerica Bank Inc., et al
as 17-1269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COURTNEY P. JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMERICA BANK INC., MARY NOWAK and GAYLA COFFELT
MA Family Services, LLC et al v. KeyBank National Association
as 1:2016cv02943
Plaintiff:
MA Family Services, LLC , KISLEV-12, LLC and Mikhail Alterman
Defendant:
KeyBank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Majestic Building Maintenance v. Huntington Bancshares Inc.
as 16-4342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAJESTIC BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED, dba Huntington National Bank
Vectair USA v. Community Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02911
Plaintiff:
Vectair USA
Defendant:
Community Bancshares, Inc. , Ford Moore , Mike Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
