Cases 121 - 130 of 270
Carner v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2014cv02820
Plaintiff:
Patrick T Carner
Defendant:
City of Cleveland , Michael McGrath , Calvin Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDivitt v. City of Fremont, et al.
as 3:2014cv02087
Plaintiff:
Misty McDivitt
Defendant:
City of Fremont, Donnale Williams , John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Ohio State Supreme Court et al
as 2:2014cv01364
Plaintiff:
Gregory T Howard
Defendant:
Ohio State Supreme Court, Kimberly Cocroft, Patrick Sheeran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Columbus, City of et al
as 2:2014cv00906
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Columbus, City of , Kimberley Jacobs and William T. Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnhart v. Carroll County, Ohio et al
as 4:2014cv01533
Plaintiff:
Devan J. Barnhart
Defendant:
Carroll County, Ohio, Dale Williams, Carroll County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Ohio State Supreme Court et al
as 2:2014cv00743
Plaintiff:
Gregory T Howard
Defendant:
Ohio State Supreme Court, Mary Ellen O'Shaughnessy, Industrial Commission of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. Donovan
as 3:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling
Defendant:
Mary Donovan, Jeffrey Froelich, Mike T. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Keller et al v. City of Mt. Healthy, Ohio
as 1:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
Kevin Keller , Keller Bryan , K&T Homes, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
City of Mt. Healthy, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pal v. FBI gov't entity employee(s) et al
as 1:2014cv00113
Plaintiff:
Leslie P. Pal
Defendant:
FBI gov't entity employee(s), Doodie and Doodie's Mom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Johnson v. Bova
as 1:2013cv02784
Plaintiff:
Jamie T. Johnson
Defendant:
Frank Bova and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
