Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Ragland et al v. City of Chillicothe
as 2:2010cv00879
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ragland , Meri Kate Enterprises, LP , Thomas Gustin and others
Defendant:
City of Chillicothe, Richard Johnson, Michele Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hudson v. Henderson et al
as 3:2010cv01649
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hudson
Defendant:
Marjorie Henderson and Roger Buck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J.M. v. Henderson et al
as 2:2009cv00855
Plaintiff:
J.M.
Defendant:
Richard N Henderson, Pike County Sherriff's Department, Beverly Ferrazzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amick et al v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00812
Plaintiff:
Carmella L Amick, Carmella L Amick, Michelle Amick and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Director, Ohio Department of Correction & Rehabilitation, Belmont Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson et al v. City of Richmond Heights et al
as 1:2009cv01406
Plaintiff:
Miguel Henderson, Micaela Henderson, Miguel Henderson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond Heights, Richmond Heights Police Department, Michael D. Gerl, Detective and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Brudmak et al
as 1:2009cv01215
Plaintiff:
Paul S Henderson
Defendant:
Lou Brudmak, Gerald T. McFaul and Stuart A Friedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Mascio et al
as 2:2008cv01088
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Reed
Defendant:
John J Mascio, Joseph J Bruzzese, Jr, David E Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Amara v. ATK, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00427
Plaintiff:
Ayman Amara
Defendant:
ATK, Inc., Brian Barbar, Robert Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ealy v. Wolff et al
as 3:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Ealy
Defendant:
Harry H Wolff and Carl S. Henderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
