Cases 391 - 400 of 8,828
Leathers et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Anne M Leathers, Michael Roe, Jr., Lonnie Pittman and others
Defendant:
United States, Joseph R Biden, Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Scott v. Homeland Security
as 2:2022cv03037
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Scott
Defendant:
Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cobb v. Elford Inc.
as 2:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Wayne Alan Cobb
Defendant:
Elford Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Divito v. City of Bedford Heights et al
as 1:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Martine Divito
Defendant:
City of Bedford Heights and Fletcher D Berger, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shaw v. Wozniak et al
as 2:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Traci M. Shaw
Defendant:
Richard Wozniak and City of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Denes v. Hinton et al
as 2:2023cv01536
Plaintiff:
Angela Denes
Defendant:
John L Hinton, Andreas D Cotter, Aaron Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Summit Behavioral Healthcare
as 2:2023cv01522
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Summit Behavioral Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Summit Behavioral Healthcare
as 2:2023oe01522
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Summit Behavioral Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolan et al v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Kathryn L. Nolan and Ann Vosburg
Defendant:
Richard D. Wetzel, Kathy Smedley, Paul John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Filing Error
as 4:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christopher Green
Defendant:
City of East Liverpool, Gregory Bricker, David Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
